New Views
In order to change this paradigm we need to shift and change our present views.
Here a some topics that need to be reconsidered.
The classic way in which the 7 chakras are represented should be reconsidered. It is not from the top to the bottom but rather from the inside/centre of the energy body to the outside. 
A new approach would be to see the colors not from top to bottom but rather from the centre outwards. The highest color frequency should lie in the centre circling outwards with the lowest frequency on the outer border. Therefore the red color should be indicated on the outer circle and the purple/white in the centre. Thus viewing the chakras should be done as if standing and looking down onto a person.
When noticing a rainbow the same will be seen with the lower band frequencies (red) on the outer rim.
The transmitting frequencies from different organs may be in correspondence with the chakra frequencies and therefore the names given e.g. the heart chakra.
The classical way may be confusing in the sense that it gives the idea that only certain organs transmit energy instead of realizing that the whole body is an energy transmitting/receiving body and therefore should be indicated as such.
Where does the God-spark reside? In the centre of your body with the highest frequency, purple. The Red colored chakra on the other hand is associated with the worldly, the mundane, the traditional etc. It is therefore associated with everything in the world around us and not within us. Therefore it will make sense to place red on the outside border, furthest away from the "god-spark".
Another point that is normally not mentioned when dealing with the chakras is the fact that the chakras do not only operate in the front of the body. Chakra energy permeates through the whole body. Only the 7 major chakras of probably thousands of chakras are mentioned on the one side of the body only. Probably because of the 7 major notes of an octave. There are probably major chakra frequencies at the back of the body that are probably linked with the 5 half notes in an octave. This then should be mentioned too. In so doing the full 12 note octave is mentioned. The back chakras being a half-note lower in frequency than the front in order to coincide with the musical notes on a piano (seven white full notes and 5 black half notes). My gut feeling is that this could be more correct than the classical view. Please send an email if you really think that I am missing the boat here.
I also see the ego-energies as very magnetic, turning into a kind of a knot right around the ‘god-centre’. All these lower magnetic band frequencies therefore become very dense around the ‘god-spark’, blocking the ‘god’ feeling. When we are nervous we therefore feel separated from All That Is – we feel very alone and that causes the nervous pain right on top of your tummy. To dissolve the ego-effect I found that it works when I pull white light into the centre of my body so as to dissolve the lower band frequencies around the ’god-spark’.
A definite frequency difference between the front side of the body and the back of the body should be noticed. So there should be a slight color difference. Can someone test this? Please let me know. E -spirit

On Reincarnation
I used to believe in the process of reincarnation but after serious pondering it seems like an intensified form of karma. The problem I have with karma (and I know it is the natural law of cause & effect) is that unnecessary feelings of quilt are created. Which seems similar to the heaven/hell concept. The religious fear-driven concepts of punishment after death. Also the idea that anything or anyone else but you are to be blamed for your current situation e.g. it is because of your murderous attitude in a previous life therefore you will be punished in this life. So the conventional view on karma is that of a reversed Christian view the only difference is the place. For Christians hell is somewhere (they can’t exactly say where) and for the Karma followers hell is on earth. So this whole concept made me think a little harder to come up with a solution of what happens after death.
Now considering that the Quantum physicists are correct then this world and any other world is an illusion. So for sure there can’t be a physical hell or even another world exactly like this one in my afterlife. So I figured out that it could be something like this:
Whilst on earth we create a myriad of intentions. These intentions become a collective consciousness grid of all intentions. Another name for these already created intentions is memory. So there is a collective memory bank. So once you die your body disperses into a trillion or more separate particles and possibly becoming one with the memory grid if not already there anyway. So once pure Spirit or Pure light, coming from source, enters into this dimension it has to travel through this memory grid where it then collects memories from different previous lives, forming a new “soul body” – keep in mind. So if anyone is doing regression then memories (previous manifested intentions) could be picked up. But is this the memories of one soul-body, staying intact, life after life, experiencing all there is to experience? I don’t think so.
Soul is of a much higher vibration rate. Let me use the example of boiling water. The water itself, still in the container, could be related to the soul-body on earth but once we boil it, it evaporates, dispersed into a trillion or more parts, not staying intact as a vapor body. It does not mean that the water never existed. There are still the memories of water – all its uses, functions and structure – but that now is only a memory. Could the dispersed vapor particles join up with other particles in the air to form something totally new? Yes, for sure. Can we, with further investigation of the new form, find that water vapor existed prior to the new form? Yes, for sure. And that for me is the simple explanation of what happens after death. Do I live forever? Yes, in the form of all prior manifestations or memories.
e-spirit
When we are nervous we experience pain right in the centre of our body – our stomach. This is also the spot where the ‘god-spark’ resides. The ego takes the electromagnetic frequencies of the outer layers e.g. red, orange etc. and winds it up and pulls it in, forming as to say a frequency knot right around the god-centre. All these lower band frequencies therefore become very dense around the ‘god-spark’. Blocking the ‘god’ feeling. When we are nervous we therefore feel separated from All That Is – we feel very alone and that causes the pain. To dissolve the ego-effect I found that it works when I pull in or focus on white or purple light in the centre of my body so as to dissolve the lower frequencies.
When I close my eyes the world ceases to exist. The material realm stops. Matter dissolves. Relativity ceases. Duality ends. Matter defrost into a, possibly, quantum spirit. Spirit shines brighter. Spirit-Source connection is clear. God emerges. So, is this a godless reality we “live” in or rather “dream” in? Am I the shadow part of God? What tragedy I see! Is my being shadow capable of me being God? Is god capable of being me, the shadow? It is a question of god and self, of shadow and light, of matter and quantum, of science and spirituality.
What if reality is so illusionary that when no-one thinks of a specific person for a specific time and that person also is not thinking of themselves in that same specific moment then no creation or manifestation is happening in that specific time and space and that is the moment that person is therefore unconscious and dies. Therefore the spirit retracts from the soul-body when no manifestation is happening around it (no-one thinks consciously of the person) and that is the moment the person dies. This will mean that all people who die is always unconscious before the accident happens. Therefore, accidents happen when you are unconscious for that moment. Just as when you are by accident cutting your finger with a knife it is because you were not quite there, not thinking and therefore unconscious.
Not a new Idea but a fresh reminder – there is no such thing as RACE
People treat the idea of race as if it implies different species. As if White is one specie and black is another specie. We tend to forget that the human race is one race, one specie and that the skin color is only determined by one gene out of millions of other genes. It is like either having a wart on your finger and not having a wart on your finger. It is therefore also very difficult to claim that you are for example an African just because your skin color is black. Genetically a black person can have more European-linked genes and a White person may have more African – linked genes. To claim that Africa belongs to the Africans – and by that meaning, the black population, is complete misrepresentation and misinformation. Your African-ness has nothing to do with your skin colour but rather with what percentage “African –linked” or African-connected genes you have. To play the Race-card is therefore an excuse for something else – maybe power, greed, manipulation etc.
The question nowadays on everyone’s lips is ‘Will 2012 be the end’? We are concerned about the end of the world. The world that we know; the 3D world that we grew accustomed to. The world of hate, war, greed, judgment, financial crisis, illness, energy shortages, etc... We are worried about the end of a world that we actually regard as a problem.
According to the ancients and many or all religions this world is the one to overcome. There is a promise of a new world, a better world, a heaven, a nirvana etc. We can deduce from it or conclude therefore that it will be a good thing to overcome and escape this world.
Now we also know that we can escape maybe many worlds but the universal laws will still be operating. One such law suggest that everything happens in cycles. The end of one world and the beginning of a next world. So what waits is a beginning of a next world. Does it mean new beginnings for me as a person or new beginnings as a whole for the whole? I believe it is new beginnings for the whole. In a new world there will be no more me. There can be no knowledge even of a 3D world. Just as we evolved from a possible 2D world (flatland) or 6D world and remembered nothing thereof, so it will be when we enter the new world. No recollection of 3D. Nothing familiar awaits us. There in fact will be no me or us. What kept us in 3D was the ego. An ego that was formed with electromagnetic memories. When the shift happens, the electromagnetism shifts and all magnetic memories will be lost in an instant. What awaits us in the new world is a clean slate, a blank page. Just like new-born babies that have no ego, so it will be. A brand new world. No ego, no memory. There may develop a kind of ego over a period of time, but then again, what is time? When in this new world we transgressed time. So, no time. So a world without ego and without time. Can we even imagine such a world? So what can we expect in this world? Well for the first few billion years (I know there is no time but this is just to explain), for the first few billion years another big bang must happen. Then depending on the frequencies, vibrations, frictions and ratios thereof new worlds will form and on each new world, depending on the atmosphere thereof, new forms will be created. And some of these energy forms and shapes might start to manifest materially.
During the same developmental period there might be other frequencies that will form shapes or geometric forms but that will not manifest in matter. That is the world that we now call 5D or 6D. Dimensions in such ratios of geometry that we, today, cannot even imagine. Will the same ratios that apply in 3D apply to 5D? I don’t think so. It is an unthinkable world. A world of form and energy and no ego.
So what is the 5D world that people refer to whilst in 3D? When seeing entities or channeling entities from ‘other worlds’ does not necessarily mean that they are from 5D. I think that these entities are either /or parallel world entities of the 3rd dimension or sub-frequencies of 3D. It is like playing a full note on the piano and a range of other notes, secondary notes, can also be heard. So in other words these other entities are also trapped in this world line of 3D. And to enter these frequencies is not too difficult. All you need is the right frequency to take you there. But you can’t really learn from these entities. The only reason that I will suggest to you to go there is to convince you of these ‘Subs’.
So back to the first question. Where do we want to transcend to? To sub frequencies of 3D or to 5D? If you choose 5D you choose oblivion. You choose to become nothing. At maximum you choose to become an energetic geometric shape. You choose to be absorbed into the whole and to be transformed into anything from 1D to nD. Will you be aware of your choice once it happens? No you won’t because you will be cleared of all memories. What happens to your memories? I believe it becomes the data bank for future 3D beings (like us).
When a person speaks (to himself or to others) the listener acts as a sound board only. No, real intense listening is happening. I mean listening with real knowledge and understanding of what the speaker really says. The function of the listener is exclusively as a sound board testing the speaker’s self expression. The speaker keeps on sending words out to signal back how the expression was formulated. You see, in this dense world, we also have a con-densed language and therefore also a con-densed way of thinking. We are actually playing a game to see how meaningful we can express our deepest thoughts and feelings with only a limited amount of symbols. Our alphabet allows for 5 vowels. How many combinations can we make with 5 vowels. Yes sometimes we can use two of the same vowels in a row like the word eerie but that is how far it goes. Even if we might feel eeeeerie we are still only 'densely' allowed to use two vowels in a row. It is in this denseness that I sometimes want to make up my own words like snjamja or kamoeoef just to get a specific feeling out and not to feel boxed and limited by the rules of language. If we take it that sounds are vibrations then surely there can be a myriad of vibrations or frequencies linked to one vowel and therefore why not expressing these extra frequencies with symbols? How to express our inner most feelings is I believe the biggest challenge. Now, I believe that we unconsciously know this and the utterances we make towards each other is just to see how we fair in dealing with this limitation. So therefore we do not really need good listeners because the exercise of speaking is all about the speaker him/herself – how far am I with my manipulation process regarding language symbols. With this script I therefore test firstly to myself, how well I can express my thoughts.
I really want to express myself about so many things. I want to share my ideas on Free will, reincarnation; chakra energies, “enlightenment”; number vibrations; God; Jesus; synchronicity; creation, mirrors, souls; spirit and many more. So you will hear from me me!
I do not think we should say things like: You should be more positive. No, not more positive but rather less negative. Let me explain: How can God be more positive. God is the ultimate positive and everything away from God is viewed as one or other degree of negative. So we can get degrees of negative but not of positive. I see the positive in the neutral position, just like an atom having protons and neutrons in the same position with the electrons moving away from that position. Thus to be negative is to be moving away from positive but to be positive is to be just that, positive. It is the moving away from positive that creates a potentiality and not vice verse. Therefore you cannot be more or less positive. Positive and negative is normally viewed as equal opposites which is therefore not the case anymore, in my view. Therefore only one potentiality and that is away from the centre, away from positive. What about the duality concept then, the yin-yang? In my view the yin and the yang represent the negative (The inverse mirrors of the same thing namely the negative. Where is the positive then? The S shape within the yin-yang symbol presents the positive, the Spirit, that which Einstein said is the only thing that moves in a straight line and everything else curves and warps around it and is therefore everything else is illusionary. So the only duality that exists is between Spirit and everything else – that which is away from Spirit. To make it very simplistic – you cannot claim to be slightly pregnant – you either are or you are not.
We do not and will never have complete free will – not in this dimension anyway.
The Oxford advanced dictionary states about free will: “ individual’s power of guiding and choosing his actions (subject to limitations of the physical world, social environment, and inherited characteristics) ; do sth of one’s own free will: without being required or compelled”.
Subject to limitations of the physical world they say. I say our biggest limitation lies in the non-physical world i.e. the quantum dimension. Our choices are always limited to what our past experiences were. I make choices with the tools of past experiences. It is past experiences that guide my choice. So where is free will and free choice. Only when I could control my past experiences could I claim to have a free will. The dictionary further states …without being required or compelled. Again, it is the past experiences that do compel. Thus my thoughts (non-physical) are connected to the past (non-physical) compelling me to make my next choice. I do not think this needs further explaining but what I do feel is that dictionaries need to be re-looked at.
Also:
"All perception is inferential; all inference uncertain; all theory, a combination of perception and inference, is therefore educated guessing." -- de Selby, _Golden Hours_, I, 93
IDEA: The Dawning of Unity Consciousness on Planet Earth
by Simeon Chiron Nartoomid
With the election of Barack Obama as the next president of the United States of America, we entered a new era on planet Earth. This election occurred very close to our planetary entry into the 6th Day of the Galactic Underworld in the Mayan Long Count Calendar, the annual 11:11 portal and a full moon during the sign of Scorpio.
I could expound for a long time on all of the correlations and symbologies between the election of Barack Obama and these significant cosmic triggers. What seems far more relevant, however, is what I see now developing in terms of unity awareness and consciousness in our budding new administration, our country, and the world.
Obama's recent appointment of Reverend Rick Warren to be the minister who says the invocation at his inaugural ceremony is a perfect example of how unity consciousness is now starting to manifest. It is also a classic example of how it will be misunderstood and thus resisted at first by many.
The President Elect's main thrust is to unite people for a common cause to the benefit of all the people of this country and the world. He is already demonstrating this intent quite well in his various appointments for his cabinet and the other key governmental positions his transition team needed to fill.
He is choosing people for their skills and qualifications in doing a specific job to be sure, but he is also choosing people from all walks of life, persuasions and points of view. Obama is choosing people that have demonstrated the ability to work across party lines and to reach out to others to get things done and who tend to either be centrist in their views or who are tolerant of opposing views and/or who hold various views on both sides of the line. In other words, their job qualifications now include human decency, fairness and a balanced personality.
Read more on her website but she end with:
As we move into this field of awareness to express our gratitude, we too are then supporting unity consciousness on Earth by recognizing that all things serve a Divine Purpose even when they are difficult to endure. The Great Love does not exclude anything from its fold, neither should we.
From www.newearthperspectives.com
